Archive for June, 2010

Bolloré Média enters French film industry

http://www.rapidtvnews.com/index.php/201006276946/bollore-media-enters-french-film-industry.html

Pascale Paoli Lebailly ©RapidTVNews

Bolloré Média, the media branch of French industrial group Bolloré has announced the creation of a new movie acquisition and co-production subsidiary. Bolloré Média will invest €3m in the company.

Called Direct Cinéma, the new structure will buy or co-produce between six and ten films each year, with budgets comprising between €2 million and €5 million.

Direct Cinéma aims at supplying the group TV channels, Direct 8 and Virgin 17, with new original movie production along with the development of a movie library.

No Comments


CONGRESS BANS FILM FUTURES TRADING

http://www.deadline.com/2010/06/big-hollywood-win-congressional-ban-on-movie-futures-trading-becoming-a-reality/

By Nikki Finke

UPDATE: The MPAA interim CEO/president Bob Pisano weighed in this morning about the late night congressional vote to leave a ban on box office futures in the financial reform bill. Said Pisano: “We are heartened by the Conference Committee’s actions and look forward to the full House and Senate approving the legislation.” Media Derivatives’ CEO Robert Swagger singled out the lobbying efforts of Pisano as a reason he could barely get in to see representatives before they voted on the bill. Media Derivatives’ only hope now appears to be an attempt to get a waiver to operate since the Commodity Futures Trading Commission gave its approval in a split vote. Given the fervor and momentum for Wall Street reforms and consumer protections that comprise the heart of the legislation, getting a “grandfather” waiver seems unlikely. Swagger, who said Media Derivatives worked three years and spent millions of dollars, might well seek redress in the courts, and singled out Pisano as a potential target.

EARLIER: What a big Hollywood win. It looks as if all that recent MPAA lobbying of the Democratic-controlled Congress on behalf of the major movie studios has finally paid off. Because a ban on movie futures trading was just inserted into the still-not-final legislation regulating the financial sector. Right now leaders for the U.S. House and Senate are trying to reconcile their different versions of the legislation passed by each body. They’ve been at this conference process for two weeks already. The hope is to reach a compromise bill and hold a final vote before the July 4th recess. The legislation contains “sweeping changes” on everything from banks to public company shareholders to auto dealers. And the MPAA, supported by the Hollywood talent guilds and other moviemakers (but not Lionsgate), succeeded in inserting an  amendment to prevent the trading of derivatives based on box office results.

barney frank financial billThe Hollywood Reporter’s Alex Ben Block was first to report it was approved just before 1 AM ET Friday by the House-Senate conference committee. Chair Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass) said during a short discussion that while there had been controversy about movie futures, the House conferees were not going to exercise their option to alter the amendment banning movie futures trading. He said they were agreeing to the amendment as written by Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) for the Senate bill. ‘By not addressing it, we have acquiesced in that,’ said Frank. Needless to say, the various firms wanting to launch box office futures trading were pissed tonight, especially since they’d recently received regulatory approval ranging from the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to the FCC.

They’re now talking about a lawsuit.

No Comments


Women agenda for Nollywood

http://thenationonlineng.net/web3/sunday-magazine/arts-life/3664.html

By Patience Saduwa

The need for the Nollywood film industry to produce more movies that reflect the socio-cultural and artistic aspects of the nation’s life was highlighted at a film forum in Lagos recently. The forum, convened by Bisi Adeleye Fayemi, Executive Director, the African Women Development Fund (AWDF) and organised by the Lufodo Academy of the Performing Arts (LAPA), had as theme ‘Nollywood: Women and the dynamics of representation. It attracted prominent movie practitioners and members of the academia as discussants in various sessions of the two-day event. Various discussants  noted the power of the film medium and stressed on the need for filmmakers to be careful about the type of messages they pass to their audience. It also stated that the need to make money should not be exclusive of the need to make decent films ‘that will stand the test of time.’ The forum further assessed the role films can play in cultural imperialism with particular reference to Hollywood and how that industry has helped shape the world’s view of America.

As talkshow host, Agatha Amata noted: “Nobody can tell your story better than you. America has sold us the hype of being the most powerful country in the world through Hollywood and people here now think there’s no poverty in the U.S. It’s when they get there that they see beggars on the streets and they are shocked. If America can use the media to sell you a hype that’s not true, then it shows the power of the media. So, we should be careful about the messages passed to the audience especially young people who erroneously believe that everything they see on TV is right.”

It was in this light that another discussant, Abena Busia in her paper titled, ‘Women and the Dynamics of Representation: Of Cooking, Cars, and Gendered Culture’ expressed concern about the manner in which African women are portrayed in the movies. According to her, Nollywood had become a force due in part to, “the existence of such a mass of films, now available, and watched in every corner of the globe.” Busia, who is an Associate Professor of English, Women’s Studies and Comparative Literature at Rutgers University, New Jersey, United States added that, “How women are presented to audiences in a number of media has been of concern for a number of women and women’s movements around the world. As human beings, we all become concerned about how we are seen by others, how we are re-presented to the world, especially by others who do not count themselves as one of our member. And when we do not see ourselves reflected, or reflected as we would like, the need for redress, to challenge the discrepancies between how we see ourselves and how you know ourselves to be seen, becomes a powerful driving force, and not just for women.”

Resultantly, Prof. Onookome Okome, a Canada -based teacher of English and Films studies stressed the need to have rounded female characters, instead of one dimensional ones in order to avoid monotony.

Not just whores and witches

It was such monotony that made another discussant, Pastor Biodun Ibitola, broadcaster and marketer to stop watching films. “I got tired of seeing women portrayed in the same way in the stories/films,” she complained during day two of the forum which kicked off with a discussion on Saints, Whores, Nags and Witches - three major stereotypes of women in Nollywood movies. Filmmaker Emem Isong gave the lead presentation during the session, moderated by TV talkshow host Funmi Iyanda which focused on society’s perception of women generally. To the TV presenter,  ‘every single successful woman worldwide is called a witch or whore,’ adding that the impression foreigners who watch Nigerian movies have of Nigerian women is that of being ‘stupid, money-grasping and prostitutes.’ “These are the stereotyped images of the Nigerian woman which Nollywood is passing to the rest of the world through the movies. This is an issue which needs to be addressed,” she stated. While comparing Hollywood’s portrayal of American women to the way the Nigerian woman is represented, she noted: “ The white, blond American woman is at the highest level of womanhood to the American man. You can never see her raped, maltreated or abused in a Hollywood film unless she has done something really bad to deserve it.”

Countering this view of women in films, Ibitola  noted that it was time script writers began to write stories that tapped into women’s traditional role in society. “Women play various roles in the community as mothers, grandmothers, aunties, sisters and so on”, she said, noting that African women have moral standards and societal mores which need to be portrayed in the movies. Supporting this view was Dion Jemide who noted: “Film is art and not just about making money. It’s time Nollywood started making more artistic movies.”

However, top filmmaker Amaka Igwe, posited that the Nollywood film industry was fashioned out to entertain and not to teach anything. “These films are made just to sell. They don’t teach anything.” Igwe, who called herself an ‘unrepentant commercial film maker’, stated that filmmakers should not take the audience for granted because they are much more intelligent than the filmmakers think. As she put it: “They analyse the films and want to know why certain things happen the way they do.”

However, the need to draw a line between stereotyping and proper representation so it does not become propaganda was also highlighted. On this issue, Busia said: “ Where do we draw the line between demanding socially responsible art and policing the artist? Besides, can we police morality or demand, as opposed to desire, socially responsible art forms; and again, as I asked before, must our art be required to be what we consider positive, for then when does it become propaganda, why not be content with reflecting what is, however discomforting that may be?”

Josephine Effah Chukwuma, a women’s rights activist supported this view stating that its ‘not about glorifying women as saints but films should show that for every action there’s a reaction.” And for actress Dakore Egbuson, who revealed that she had to turn down a lot of scripts because of her concern for the quality of her work, actors should be more selective in the roles they choose and not think about the money alone.

Film clips on various themes and issues concerning women’s roles in society were shown at the event. These include Rifle Road and Jesus and the Giant, two films by Akin Omotoso, a South African-based Nigerian filmmaker which focused on gun control and domestic violence. There was also the Hollywood film, The Secret Laughter of Women, starring Joke Silva, Nia Long and Colin Firth which boasts an array of strong women in an immigrant community in France who were ‘vehicles of tradition’ even while away from home.

Movie practitioners, TV personalities, writers, arts and cultural activists and others who attended the event which was graced by Lagos State First Lady, Mrs Abimbola Fashola include Tunde Kelani, Mahmoud Ali-Balogun, Bibi Bakare-Yusuf, Emem Isong, Amaka Igwe, Peace Anyiam-Osigwe, Kunle Ajibade, Biodun Ibitola. Others include Bimbo Oloyede, Agatha Amata, Toyin Akinosho, Reuben Abati, Funmi Iyanda, Iretiola Doyle and Emma Isikaku.

Also in attendance were Nollywood stars including Chioma Chukwuka, Bimbo Manuel, Dakore Egbuson, Omoni Oboli, Uche Abriel Macaulay, Monalisa Chinda, Doris Simon, Saheed Balogun, Rose Odika, Carol King, Ego Boyo, Bhaira Mwizu, Moyo Lawal and Dupe Jaiyesimi.

No Comments


Griffith Park busiest film site in L.A. in the first quarter

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/06/griffith-park-busiest-film-site-in-the-first-quarter.html

Griffith It has a cedar grove, zoo, golf course, winding and secluded mountain roads and an iconic observatory that offers a panoramic view of Hollywood.

Griffith Park is a location manager’s paradise.

The city-owned park, which spans more than 4,210 acres and drapes the hills between Los Feliz and Burbank, consistently ranks among the most popular film locations in Los Angeles. After all, the park and its landmarks have been used in countless films and have deep roots in Hollywood lore. The park’s 1926 carousel is even credited with inspiring Walt Disney to dream up the carousel in Disneyland.

In fact, Griffith Park was the busiest public site for on-location filming in the first quarter of the year, followed by Venice Beach and the 6th Street Bridge, which is a popular spot for car commercials for luxury brands like Porsche and BMW, acccording to a recent survey conducted by FilmL.A. Inc., the nonprofit group that handles film permits for the city and much of Los Angeles County.

In the first three months of the year, the park hosted 150 “production days” — one production day is defined as a single crew’s permission to film a project at a single location in a 24-hour period — including shoots for commercials by AT&T and McDonald’s, TV shows such as “Desperate Housewives,” “Criminal Minds” and “NCIS: Los Angeles,” and the Tom Hanks movie “Larry Crowne,” which used the park for shooting a scooter scene.

“It’s such a versatile location, it can pretty much play for almost anything,” Jodi Strong, director of production planning for FilmL.A., said of the park, which was donated to the city in 1896 by Col. Griffith Jenkins Griffith, the Welsh immigrant who made a fortune in gold mining.

Tony Salome, location manager for “NCIS: Los Angeles,” has lost track of how many times he’s used the park, most recently to film a gun battle scene near the Griffith Observatory, famously depicted in the James Dean classic “Rebel Without a Cause.” For another episode last year, “NCIS” shot a car crash and explosion on Mt. Hollywood Drive.

“It’s relatively easy to use, it’s cheap and you can film pretty much anything there,” said Salome, first vice president of the Location Managers Guild of America, who also worked on the long-running Fox TV drama “24.” “When I was on “24″ we used it for every other episode. It’s kind of a catchall.”

David Berthiaume said he made extensive use of the park when he was location manager for the TV series “Gilmore Girls.”

He even shot a snow scene set in Vermont on Mt. Hollywood Drive for the 1987 feature film “Baby Boom,” starring Diane Keaton. “We spent all night making it look like Vermont,” he said, adding that the crew used soap suds and crushed ice to simulate a picturesque New England winter landscape.

“It’s a great location because it has a bunch of different looks,” Berthiaume said. “It’s a go-to place.”

-Richard Verrier

No Comments


NM film industry subsidies: corporate welfare?

http://newmexicoindependent.com/57783/nm-film-industry-subsidies-corporate-welfare

By Bryant Furlow and Trip Jennings

Citing a 2008 study of New Mexico’s film industry subsidies, Los Angeles Times business columnist Michael Hiltzik Friday questioned California’s own $100 million-a-year tax credits for Hollywood film productions, calling them “corporate welfare.”

The study showed that New Mexico saw only 14 cents in returns for every dollar it spent on film production tax credits.

According to a state review of SIC data, there were 52 film tax credits worth $46 million in 2008 and 78 credits worth $76 million in 2009, The Independent reported in March.

The value of the state’s film tax credit program, particularly in terms of its economic benefits, is a hotly debated topic in New Mexico and has been for years.

A competing report issued in January 2009 by the New Mexico Film Office found a much more positive economic impact than the report cited by Hiltzik. Conducted by Ernst & Young, the study concluded that the program had earned $0.94 in additional tax revenue for each $1.00 paid out in incentives based on the 2007 value of present and future year tax receipts and the 2007 value of state film production tax credits.

But Hiltzik counts himself among the skeptical when talk turns to reports such as the one performed by Ernst & Young.

“The rationale for this welfare program is to keep productions from fleeing to other states, taking … jobs with them,” Hiltzik reported. “But you could go blind looking for an independent study, as opposed to studies funded by the state film commissions handing out the dough, showing that such programs produce more in overall benefits than they cost.”

SIC members have raised separate concerns about the value of New Mexico’s no-interest loans for film productions, The Independent reported in March. New Mexico has given Hollywood $273 million in no-interest loans for 26 films since 2003, including $15 million for the Denzel Washington film Book of Eli, The Independent reported.

New Mexico legislators have called for Gov. Bill Richardson to curtail state subsidies for Hollywood productions.

It was reported in March that the Motion Picture Association of America was considering Richardson as the organization’s new director, a position with a salary exceeding $1 million a year.

No Comments


Returning to a more Los Angeles-centric mind-set

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-rodriguez-provincialism-20100621,0,6373162.column

Los Angeles is hardly the provinces, but we might do better to think a little more provincially.

Last week in New York, I saw a Japanese tourist on the corner of 5th Avenue and 79th Street wearing a T-shirt satirizing the “I heart NY” marketing meme. His version read, “Heart Your Own City.”

That’s great advice. As the home of the film industry along with huge chunks of the music and television industries, Los Angeles is always going to be a player among U.S. cities. But recent trends in politics and media have increasingly made Washington and New York the locus of much of our national culture. And as that has happened, the influence of other cities — including our own — has declined. The sight of that tourist’s T-shirt jolted me into thinking it’s time to fight that trend.

As the seat of the federal government, Washington has always had influence disproportionate to its size. But in recent years, with two wars, an economic crisis and a president with an ambitious agenda, Americans are even more focused on the capital. As Joel Kotkin wrote in 2009, “the great protean tradition of American urbanism — with scores of competing economic centers — is giving way to a new Romanism, in which all power and decisions devolve down to the imperial core.”

Likewise, New York, long the intellectual capital of the U.S., has seen its stature strengthened by the decline of regional newspapers and media outlets. While critics had hoped (or feared) that the digital age would decentralize information media, the opposite has happened. Manhattan’s so-called Media Corridor between 8th Avenue and Avenue of the Americas, and roughly from Columbus Circle south to 40th Street, is both more concentrated and farther reaching than ever. Over the past two decades, The New York Times has joined the Wall Street Journal as a truly national newspaper.

Oh yeah, and all that hype about the blogosphere democratizing information? Well, it was just that: hype. Now that the reading public is realizing that most blogs are self-serving claptrap, the value of the well-considered written word is rising again, but it is rising at the same time that regional periodicals are suffering. In other words, while the digital revolution walloped mid-level publications nationally, it has left elite New York publishing — newspapers, books, magazines — with more power (if not more revenues) than they have ever had.

Los Angeles still has national clout, of course. But by many measures, its influence is waning. A couple of decades ago, L.A. seemed headed toward becoming the dominant American city. Scholars predicted we were heading into “the Pacific Century,” and Los Angeles seemed poised to be the hub of the Pacific Rim.

But that promise was never fully realized. Today, as the state and city struggle against a sea of red ink, the city’s cultural elite has largely gone missing, and too many of the city’s intellectuals seem to take their cultural cues from the Northeast. I know way too many well-educated Angelenos who read the New York — rather than the Los Angeles — Times and who have little or no knowledge of what goes on in this city. It is notoriously hard to engage affluent Angelenos in local and state politics, and they are often more interested in discussing what happens on the streets of Manhattan or Washington than what is happening here at home.

Los Angeles is hardly the provinces, but we might do better to think a little more provincially.

Way back in 1962, the late art critic Kenneth Clark published an essay on what he called “the problem of provincialism.” He was talking about art and how dominant styles generally radiate out from a metropolitan center. He pondered what provincials were to do. Should they merely emulate the received wisdom from the center? Or perhaps isolate themselves and burrow into their localism? He concluded that in order to best harness their creativity, provincials had first to “come to terms with this monster.”

Back in the day, Californians did a better job of that. They were more aware that their distance from the East Coast power centers gave them the freedom to improvise and innovate, challenge and reform. Think Hollywood and the Silicon Valley. Today, we are floundering. We are less engaged in local civic life, and we are less focused on embracing the ways we are different from the rest of the country. That deprives the region — and the world, frankly — of the fantastic visions that an upstart Los Angeles once produced.

That T-shirt on 5th Avenue had it right. It’s time to heart our own city.

No Comments


Filmmakers call to end ’suffocating cycle of subsidies’

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/showbiz-and-lifestyle/film-in-wales/2010/06/21/filmmakers-call-to-end-suffocating-cycle-of-subsidies-91466-26694770/

Filmmakers have urged the Government to introduce changes to end their “suffocating cycle of reliance on subsidies”.

More than 70 British names have signed the letter to The Daily Telegraph, including producers of The Last King of Scotland, An Education and Nowhere Boy.

Most British filmmakers depend on subsidies to get their films off the ground, but the signatories want the organisations which fund them to allow them to recoup revenue to plough back into filmmaking.

Producers’ trade body Pact has put forward such proposals to “give production companies the opportunity to build self-sustaining businesses and protect our world-class writers, directors, cast and crew”.

Today’s letter says: “British films are critical both to our culture and our economy, with a vibrant and successful independent film sector that has generated such hits as An Education, Nowhere Boy and The Last King of Scotland.

“But that sector relies heavily on public funding, from the UK Film Council, BBC Films and Film4.

“These bodies insist on recouping the majority of their investment before allowing any returns to the producers – leaving the producers with no funding for their next projects, and creating a suffocating cycle of reliance on subsidies.”

Arts minister Ed Vaizey announced last week that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) would fundamentally reassess Government support for the film industry.

A spokesman for the DCMS said that the Pact report would be taken into consideration as part of the reassessment.

A Channel 4 spokesman said: “Film4 does not receive or spend any public money. Our continued investment in original British film is dependent on our ability to raise commercial revenues.

“Any proposal that limits our ability to do this, as Pact’s proposal does, will also limit our ability to reinvest in supporting the best of British film-making.”

A BBC spokesman said: “BBC Films invests £12 million a year into the British film industry. Any investment it recoups is already reinvested back into film production.”

A UK Film Council spokesperson said: “Everyone agrees that the most important use of public money is to help film businesses move into the digital age whilst at the same time making sure that Lottery money is used to support creative excellence and new talent.

“The challenge will be to make sure that balance is right.”

No Comments


Who’s running the film industry?

http://www.montrealgazette.com/opinion/letters/running+film+industry/3180659/story.html

The Gazette

Re: “Behind the scenes” (Gazette, June 12).

As a screenwriter/filmmaker/delusional romantic living in Montreal, I was interested to read your feature on the new heads of Telefilm and SODEC. It’s interesting to learn who is helming what in our industry, especially such important cultural institutions as these.

What’s disconcerting is to discover that an accountant has been put in charge of Canada’s artistic soul in one case, and a bureaucratic fossil, one of the people responsible for the flotsam littering the shores of our country from the sinking of English-Canadian cinema (phew!), in the other.

Thank our lucky stars that Quebec’s francophone filmmakers keep producing such great movies.

But I ask myself, what is wrong with English screenwriters? Do we drink the same water? Is it something in our genetic makeup? Or are we dramaturgically challenged in some profound, irreparable way? Yes, perhaps there’s some of that at play, but the policies of these public institutions might have something to do with it.

Vince Di Clemente Montreal

No Comments


MPAA President Emphasizes Need For Open Market In China

http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=131271

Hollywood and China’s entertainment industry must work together to address a number of challenges before the film market there can reach its full potential. This was the message delivered to almost 500 Chinese government officials and key film industry executives today by Bob Pisano, President and Interim CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America.

During his keynote speech at a forum of the 13th Shanghai International Film Festival, Pisano highlighted the economic importance of the motion picture industry. “The worldwide entertainment industry is one of the leading sources of new venture creation, employing hundreds of thousands of individuals with skills ranging from acting to carpentry. It contributes billions of dollars to the world economy annually and has demonstrated the capacity for near-exponential growth,” said Pisano.

Pisano touched on how free access for films is the way for local film industries to expand their capabilities through increased investment and collaborations. “An open international market can produce benefits for all concerned�studios, industry employees, consumers and governments alike” said Pisano.

Stressing the need to further liberalize the country’s film market and better fight piracy as necessary to the creative industry’s continued prosperity, Pisano reiterated the commitment of MPAA and its members companies to help “�nations to create strong and sustainable business models that enable them to produce more films, to increasingly use more local talent, to win international recognition for their products, to compete on equal footing with films produced by other nations and to profit from our communal endeavors”. China is now is one of the biggest movie markets globally. While the rest of the world is still recovering from the worst economic recession in several decades, the market in China has demonstrated exceptional resilience. This year’s box office got off to a record-breaking start with Hollywood’s 3D blockbuster “Avatar,” which grossed close to US$200 million dollars in China. Box office revenue has grown from US$120 million in 2003 to US$909 million in 2009. The number of movie screens from 2003 to 2009 quintupled to more than 5,000 - with an average of close to two movie screens being added to the market each day.

Originated in 1993, SIFF is China’s premiere and the only A-category film festival accredited by FIAPF. Organized by the Shanghai Media and Entertainment Group, the 13th SIFF runs from June 12 to 20 during the World Expo in Shanghai.

No Comments


Saving local cine industry

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2010/06/21/news0590.htm

IT has been reported that fresh moves are afoot to allow import of Indian films showing these produced under as joint ventures of both countries. Needless to say, this move, if allowed, is likely to be as fatal to the local cine industry. Because at stake is the livelihood of several hundred thousands of people connected to the local film industry. Earlier, it was indicated that the relevant Ministry was about to allow import of Indian films. This declaration was met with immediate and spontaneous disapproval by the film industry here. The decision was withdrawn as a consequence of the protests.

The cine industry in Bangladesh is traced back to the early fifties of the last century. But this local industry has gone on suffering difficult patches throughout its entire existence. First, the films from erstwhile West Pakistan held sway over the viewers here in the pre-independence era. Imported Indian cinema, particularly of the aesthetically improved variety, also had a negative effect on Dhaka’s cine industry in the sixties. After the independence of Bangladesh, a resurgence of sorts of the local film industry was noted as Indian cinema remained banned since the 1965 Indo-Pak War and West Pakistani cinema also stopped coming.

The twin developments helped the growth of the cinema industry. Despite sometimes credible allegations that poor quality films were being pushed served to viewers here in this situation of monopoly. Yet a large number of films of high quality were also produced in the country. The cable TV culture from the last decade caused slide in the number of movie-goers. But responding to that challenge, local producers in recent years have been making also good quality social films that attracted large crowds and did good business in varying degrees.

No Comments



SetPageWidth