Archive for the ‘South America Industry News’ Category

Brazil battles image problems amid movie boom

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6852KM20100906

By R.T. Watson

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - It was the middle of the night in Jardim Tiradentes, one of Sao Paulo’s rougher neighborhoods. A two-man crew was waiting to film a police raid when chief inspector Rafael Correa Lodi broke the bad news.

“If there’s a risk of them killing the girl, there’s also a risk they will fire at us — so you guys have to stay here.”

He was addressing director Jorge Atalla and his cameraman, who had been following the inspector’s anti-kidnapping team for close to a year for the upcoming documentary “Sequestro.” Now, just as the cops were about to storm a shabby building where a 6-year-old girl was believed to be held, Atalla was forced to withdraw.

If some had their way Atalla might cease making his film altogether.

With Brazil’s film industry in the midst of a major resurgence, local filmmakers, intent on chronicling the country’s character in unflinching fashion, find themselves at odds with a strategy to improve the global perception that Brazil is a crime-ridden land with little to offer the international film community.

Regardless of image concerns, within the local film sector plenty has changed and optimism is running at an all-time high. Box office revenues rose 33% in 2009, while the market share for indigenous releases was up 43% to 14.2%, according to Pedro Buchter, editor of preeminent local film trade Filme B.

Ticket grosses are up 20% through July and the film sector is expected to crack the R$1 billion ($568 million) mark for the first time by year’s end.

“It’s Brazil’s time,” says Sergio Leitao, CEO of Riofilme, a municipally funded organization that fuels film production in Rio. “We have to live up to the challenge.”

Brazil is doing just that.

Massive initiatives, both private and state-sponsored, plan to add several hundred more screens to the market in the next few years. In the private sector Mexican exhibitor Cinepolis, new to the territory, is investing $284 million into unveiling 290 new screens in the next two years, while the government’s Cinema Near You program will extend low-interest credit lines to national exhibitors who build in small towns or highly populated urban areas that lack theaters.

Besides the expected growth in exhibition, well-funded new film schools and state-of-the-art studio facilities, government-sponsored groups like Cinema do Brasil and Riofilme are actively championing Brazil as a welcoming place to make movies.

Consider:

The city of Paulinia, a small oil-rich municipality near Sao Paulo, just spent more than $60 million on Polo Cinematografico de Paulinia, an expansive studio lot with state-of-the-art 3D animation stations and more than 5 million square feet of land reserved for sets.

Leitao’s Riofilme is negotiating with Summit Entertainment to shoot part of the final “Twilight” installment in the Rio area and has reportedly offered to cover 50% of production costs that “Twilight” would accrue there. Instead of coming from Riofilme’s budget, the city of Rio would invest a portion of its marketing budget into the production.

Riofilme is also working with Conspiricao Filmes on landing a Woody Allen production in Rio. After a visit to Rio’s emerald shores late last year by Allen’s agent, Steve Tenenbaum, and his producer, Letty Aronson, Mayor Eduardo Paes promised he’d raise whatever capital is required from private investors, if Allen commits. Riofilme also pledged $1 million toward the project, hoping Allen will conjure urban splendor similar to 2008’s “Vicky Cristina Barcelona.”

In addition to Paulinia and other sophisticated studios like Estudios Quanta, also Brazil’s largest rental house, the country boasts versatile locales, agreeable weather and a thriving TV industry, meaning facilities and manpower are already in place. And while Brazil’s currency has been strengthening — at almost 1.8 Brazilian Reais to the dollar, compared with 2.6 in 2008 — the rate of exchange is still appealing to international producers.

“With such a huge television industry, there are qualified crews everywhere,” says producer Eduardo Levy, who recently started the Brazilian Film Network in Los Angeles to aid production companies considering a Brazil shoot. “Your average working week in Brazil is six days and you don’t have to pay as much in overtime, pensions or health. The cost of personnel is much lower (than in other parts of the world).”

Against all this, however, comes the negative image of Brazil — and Rio in particular — as a center of violence, that films like Atalla’s have unfortunately perpetuated.

Daniel Filho’s biopic “Chico Xavier” has taken in more than $17 million at the local box office this year.

“People think of Brazil in terms of corruption and only our bad side, and I am also a bit responsible for that,” concedes director Fernando Meirelles, whose “City of God” (2002) both dazzled audiences worldwide while reinforcing stereotypes about the slums (or “favelas”) surrounding Rio de Janiero.

In the eight years since “City of God,” little has changed in the way Brazil is viewed around the globe.

“The negative (has not been) contextualized with the positive or anything in between, thus leaving the spectrum incomplete,” producer Joshua Skurla says.

Many local filmmakers remain intent on creating portraits of Brazilian life that are as vivid as they are genuine, irrespective of the role they play in forming perceptions abroad — as with Atalla’s “Sequestro” and Jose Padilha’s upcoming police actioner, “Elite Squad 2,” the follow-up to the brutally violent original from 2007.

With “Squad 2″ about to receive the widest release of any Brazilian film in the past 20 years, thanks in larger part to Padilha’s own ambitions, he and his team are more interested in filling theater seats than rebranding Brazil’s image.

“I want my company and the investors of the film to make as much money as possible so I can make other films,” he says. “(But) every single movie that I have done has been about social commentary (which) I think can be entertaining. The more people that go to watch the movie the more debate I generate.”

One project that could positively impact the country’s image is Skurla’s “Rio, I Love You,” the latest installment in the Cities of Love franchise that includes 2006’s “Paris, I Love You” and 2009’s “New York, I Love You.”

With principal photography planned for first-half 2011, Leitao notes that “the idea is to attract films to Rio and promote Rio in a positive way. It would be like product placement.” Make no mistake, Leitao’s Riofilme sees international productions not only as opportunities to shift the paradigm but also a significant measure to boost foreign spending in the local sphere.

For Meirelles, who, like Padilha, has already signed on to direct one of the “Rio, I Love You” segments, changing negative stereotypes matters.

“After showing the hard part, it’s going to be good to show a good part of the city,” he says. “(’Rio, I Love You’) is going to be very positive, to compensate for ‘City of God.’”

Perhaps.

But back in Jardim Tiradentes, that’s the last thing on Atalla’s mind.

Shortly after he and his cameraman were forbidden to enter the building, they managed to recruit one of the officers to carry a small DV camera inside. Atalla had to sit out, but the footage proved invaluable, capturing the liberation of the young girl.

When Atalla saw the footage, he was thrilled. Now that the film is finished, however, his feelings are decidedly mixed.

“Most people I know who end up coming here for a couple of days wind up wanting to stay more, but (’Sequestro’) could have a negative effect, that’s for sure,” he admits. ” a documentary needs to show things we have not seen before and I was trying to show something that I had not seen. I never thought about whether it would frighten people from coming to (Brazil).”

No Comments


South America

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/world/news/e3i8af56baccdd2a1c6306733e8d3b5f20d

By John Hecht

When Argentina’s “The Secret in Their Eyes” won the Oscar for best foreign-language film this year — and when Peru’s “The Milk of Sorrow”was also nominated — it signaled that South America is witnessing a remarkable revival in filmmaking.

While giants Argentina and Brazil continue to dominate the region in terms of production output and market share, these days it’s impossible to talk about the territory as a whole without also including Chile, Colombia, Peru and Uruguay. True, none of these smaller nations boasts the infrastructure of Argentina or Brazil, but each is making a serious effort to strengthen co-production ties, promote locations and sweeten filming incentives.

Here’s a closer look at some of South America’s top film industries.

ARGENTINA

Long considered the mecca of Spanish language cinema in South America, Argentina in 2009 saw its largest boxoffice take for domestic fare in a decade, helped by the fact that indigenous production receives a percentage of boxoffice revenue and video rentals.

Last year also brought the inaugural edition of the Buenos Aires film market Ventana Sur, an international industry gathering dedicate exclusively to sales of Latin American titles. Ventana was formed through a joint venture between Argentina’s film institute, INCAA, and the Festival deCannes’Marche du Film.

“We had an excellent turnout,” Ventana Sur executive director Bernardo Bergeret says. “We were expecting about 800 guests and had nearly 1,600, with about 200 from Europe and North America. It takes place about six months after Cannes, so you can find titles in the video library that haven’t been in any other market.”


“Gigante”

Several of those titles come from native helmers. Given its reputation for developing some of the continent’s most renowned filmmakers, Argentina regularly maintains a strong presence on the international festival circuit. Pablo Trapero’s “Lion’s Den” vied for the Palme d’Or in 2008 and his latest drama, “Carancho,” starring Ricardo Darin (”The Secret in Their Eyes”), is poised as a strong festival contender.

Argentine cinema travels well to Europe and some parts of Latin America, but, with few exceptions, it has struggled to crack the U.S. Latino market. While “Secret” was a huge boxoffice success in Argentina and has been sold to more than a dozen territories, Sony Pictures Classics is giving the film only a limited U.S. theatrical release.

“The U.S. Latino market is very peculiar,” director Juan Jose Campanella says. “In the U.S., the film is going to be released on the art film circuit, so it will attract mostly cinephiles. Just about every popular foreign film is released in the U.S. as if it were an art film.”

BRAZIL

Many filmmakers rank Brazil’s generous tax incentive program as the most attractive in Latin America, allowing producers to invest 3% of their owed income tax toward a local project. Additionally, any foreign producer or distributor exporting content from Brazil can redirect up to 70% of the withholding tax for investment in a Brazilian production.

“It’s a very ample law,” film financier Alex Garcia says. “The combination of both incentives gives producers the possibility of getting up to $3 million — and it doesn’t just apply to movies; it applies to the entertainment industry in general.”

Garcia partnered last year with Argentine producer Eduardo Constantini and Brazilian producer Vania Catani of Bananeira Films to form Costa Films Brazil. The first movie they produced under the joint venture was “Lula, the Son of Brazil,” a biopic about Brazilian president Luis Inacio Lula da Silva.

Before forming their company, Garcia and Constantini created film fund Latin American Film Co. with the Weinstein Co. and Brazil’s Otero Group. The fund backed Jose Padilha’s Golden Bear winner “The Elite Squad,” a boxoffice success that now has a sequel in production.

Among Brazil’s highly anticipated releases this year is the Conspiracao Filmes co-production “Lope.” The biopic, directed by Andrucha Waddington (”House of Sand”), chronicles the life of Spanish playwright Lope de Vega. The spiritualist drama “Our Home,” from director Wagner de Assis and lensed by “The Day After Tomorrow” cinematographer Ueli Steiger, has also generated buzz as a potential blockbuster. Fox will release it in September.

At Cannes, Brazil will introduce the upstart Rio Content Market, an audiovisual mart to be held in Rio de Janeiro in mid-November. Organizers of the three-day event aim to position Rio as the region’s leading market for buyers and sellers of multiplatform content and new media.

COLOMBIA

Film production in Colombia has been growing steadily during the past seven years, thanks in large part to a film law enacted in 2003 that established a state-run fund. On average, the nation now produces about a dozen features annually and, more important, the production quality has vastly improved.

While no direct fiscal incentives are available for foreign producers, Colombian partners can apply for tax credits of up to 42% and Colombia offers a 16% value-added tax devolution on production services.

Dynamo Prods. producer Andres Calderon says that now, more than ever, foreign film and TV shingles are reaping the benefits of shooting in Colombia.

“You can get all these tax benefits,” he says. “And we don’t have unions here, so people work hard and really long hours. That’s why (outsiders) are coming here.”

Mike Newell filmed “Love in the Time of Cholera” in the coastal city of Cartagena and Paul Haggis recently shot scenes in Colombia for his latest thriller, “The Next Three Days.”

As Colombia looks to draw more runaway production, the industry and government alike have turned to promotional campaigns aimed at countering the nation’s violent image. RCN-owned production services company Shoot Colombia addresses lingering concerns with the slogan “We won’t shoot you, you will shoot us.” The modern-day reality is that Colombia delivers on its promise to offer a safe work environment.

The country’s production boom has paid dividends for a new generation of filmmakers as well. Recent victories on the international festival circuit include Oscar Ruiz’s freshman feature “Crab Trap,” Ciro Guerra’s music odyssey “The Wind Journeys” and the Colombia co-production “Anger,” a romantic thriller directed by Ecuadorian helmer Sebastian Cordero.

One of the most eagerly awaited releases is the Colombia-Spain co-production “The Stoplight Society,” which has received support from numerous funds, including Fonds Sud Cinema.

CHILE

Just when things were turning around for the Chilean film industry, a devastating earthquake rocked the nation in late February, forcing the government to shift its attention to emergency relief and rebuilding efforts.

“Chile is in a complicated situation after the earthquake because the priorities of the country have shifted in every sense,” says Sergio Gandara, executive manager of film and TV producers’ association Cinema Chile. “The industry is being affected in terms of logistics and possibly the amount of public financing available because entertainment is not a priority for the country right now.”

Several shoots were postponed because of the earthquake, including “Profugos,” the first HBO series to be filmed in Chile.

In spite of the recent setback, Chile’s film industry finds itself in a much better place nowadays than it did a decade ago when the nation was releasing one domestic feature a year; it averages about 10 local releases annually.

Cinema Chile, an initiative created to promote the country’s film and TV industries, is lobbying Congress to implement a sorely needed tax incentive program to boost domestic production and make Chile a more attractive filming location. One of the goals is to draw more large-scale foreign shoots like “Quantum of Solace,” which was shot on Chilean turf in 2008.


“Crab Trap”

One of the most notable titles to come out of Chile recently is Sebastian Silva’s drama “The Maid,” which was acquired by Shoreline Entertainment just before it won the Sundance jury prize last year. Projects in the works include “Post Mortem,” from director Pablo Larrain; “El Futuro,” a feature from Alicia Scherson based on a Roberto Bolano novel; and an untitled biopic about Chilean folk singer Violeta Parra from helmer Andres Wood.

PERU

Peru has been producing films on a constant basis since the 1970s, but 2010 has shaped up as a breakthrough year.

First came the news that Javier Fuentes-Leon’s gay-themed drama “Undertow” had won the Sundance audience award. A month later, Claudia Llosa’s second feature, “The Milk of Sorrow,” snagged a foreign-language Oscar nomination.

Peru also claims fame for making Latin America’s first animated 3D film, the Alpamayo Entertainment-produced “Piratas en el Callao.”

While Fuentes-Leon says it would be a stretch to say Peru actually has an industry when comparing its infrastructure to other South American territories, it still manages to produce about half a dozen features a year. These films have found ways to reach foreign audiences — like “Undertow,” picked up by Shoreline.

“The film never makes a reference to where it was shot,” Fuentes-Leon explains. “It’s a universal story and we saw it as an opportunity to not limit the film specifically to Lima or another town, so that audiences can identify with their own towns. (It) can travel to Mexico, Colombia or even South Africa.”

URUGUAY

Uruguay makes a much stronger contribution to South American cinema than its population of 3.3 million might lead one to expect — even though, during the 1973-85 military dictatorship, the industry was on the brink of extinction.

The future looks bright as Uruguay now releases about half a dozen local features a year, many of which have fared exceptionally well at home and abroad. At the forefront of the nation’s cinema revival, Montevideo-based Control Z Films has produced the Cannes FIRPESCI prize winner “Whisky,” the Rotterdam Tiger Award recipient “25 Watts” and the Berlin Silver Bear winner “Giant.” In September, filming begins on “Tres,” the latest feature from “Whisky” co-director Pablo Stoll.

The results have been encouraging enough that private investment in Uruguayan cinema has grown sixfold, says Martin Papich, director of the government-run film and audiovisual institute. Papich’s agency manages a $6 million public fund, a small amount even by Latin American standards, though Uruguayan pictures tend to get produced on much smaller budgets than those of the region’s larger industries.

A large chunk of the growing private investment comes from abroad, and about 90% of Uruguayan films are co-productions. “Uruguayan cinema wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for the co-production system,” Papich says.

No Comments


411 Publishing Announces National & International Online Listings

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/411-publishing-announces-national-international-online-listings-2010-04-26?reflink=MW_news_stmp

LOS ANGELES, Apr 26, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) — 411 Publishing Co., the leader in providing qualified below-the-line production resources to the entertainment industry with their L.A. and New York 411 print and online directories, has added National and International sections to LA411.com (www.LA411.com) and NewYork411.com (www.NewYork411.com).

411’s National section will initially include over 1,300 qualified listings in over 100 categories from the top ten production states outside of the L.A. and New York areas. Each National listing has been vetted by 411’s editorial staff to meet their standard of only listing companies and individuals with credits on theatrically released films or on television or commercials that have aired on broadcast or cable networks.

Up until now, the location requirement for all 411 listings was limited to Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Bernardino, San Diego, or Ventura Counties and New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, or Philadelphia. The National section has been added to help producers find qualified production resources and below-the-line talent in states offering them the best tax incentives and location possibilities. There are currently over 33,000 qualified listings in the L.A. & NY 411 directories.

“While our number one goal has always been to nurture and support local below-the-line production companies, we’ve been asked repeatedly by our users to supply qualified production resources outside of Southern California and New York,” said 411 Publishing publisher Sean Killebrew. “As such, we have added national and international listings and will continue to listen to the community and expand our reach as necessary.”

In partnership with sister company KEMPS, 411 users can also search 50,000 film, television and commercial production companies in 115 countries worldwide. The information is updated daily to ensure reliability.

The new sections are accessible to users from either LA411.com or NewYork411.com.

About 411 Publishing:

For over 30 years, 411 Publishing has set the standard for business-to-business directories. 411 Publishing provides the entertainment industry with the best, most trustworthy production resources for film, TV, commercials, video and music video production. 411 Publishing is owned by Reed Business Information, the largest business-to-business publisher in the U.S. and a member of the Reed Elsevier Group plc (NYSE: RUK and ENL), a global publisher and information provider.

SOURCE: 411 Publishing Co.

No Comments


Film locations trade show holds steady

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/21/business/la-fi-ct-onlocation-20100421

Despite a decline in the industry, the 25th annual event in Santa Monica attracts about the same number of exhibitors and visitors as last year.

By Richard Verrier, Los Angeles Times

Hollywood is making fewer movies, film producers are having a tougher time getting financing and cash-strapped governments around the world are facing more pressure than ever to justify tax breaks given to the film industry.

In such a climate, you might think the Locations Trade Show in Santa Monica last week would have been a ghost town. Hardly.

The 25th annual event that ended Saturday drew 241 exhibitors from 30 countries and nearly 4,000 visitors, including producers, location scouts, vendors and bankers.

That’s nearly the same level of participation as last year — according to the Assn. of Film Commissioners International, which organizes the three-day trade show at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium.

“We’re deliriously happy with the attendance of exhibitors and foot traffic,” said Larry Brownell, executive director of the AFCI. “Compared to other industries, we’ve really held our own.”

Reflecting the more austere climate, there were a few notable absences, including film commissions from South Africa and China (organizers cited possible visa issues), and some of booths were smaller or less lavish than before. Six Canadian film commissions were represented this year, down from 14 last year, even though the provinces of Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia all have boosted their film incentives.

But there were several new foreign participants eager to tout their locations and new film programs. Some were coming for the first time, while others were making a return after several years absence. New attendees included Morocco, Austria, Jamaica, Croatia and even Abu Dhabi, the modern city in the United Arab Emirates.

One of the world’s largest oil producers, Abu Dhabi has been seeking to diversify into other industries, such as financial services, tourism and now film. Abu Dhabi, where the dramas “Syriana” and “The Kingdom” were partially shot, launched its film program this year and was eager to spread the word in Santa Monica.

“We have modern architecture and desert islands,” said David Shepheard, a former film commissioner in Britain who was hired to head the Abu Dhabi Film Commission. “Our message is: Abu Dhabi is a stable filmmaking hub in the Middle East.”

On the other side of the auditorium, Serbian Film Commission Executive Director Ana Ilic was busy promoting her country’s new film incentive program, which offers a rebate of up to 25% on production expenses; and scenic locales, from the banks of the Danube River to the bustling center of its capital, Belgrade.

“We have strong, long tradition of filmmaking and more versatile locations than anywhere else,” Ilic said. “We’re 15% cheaper than Romania and 20% cheaper than Hungary, and that’s without the incentives.”

There were also 32 U.S. states represented (including a sizable contingent from California), down from last year. Kentucky, Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina and Wisconsin were no-shows after participating in 2009, reflecting cuts in state marketing and travel budgets.

Still, major players such as New Mexico and Louisiana had large delegations. Louisiana, which recently increased its production rebate to 30% from 25%, had eight film offices represented. “The activity we’re getting is tremendous,” said Christopher Stelly, Louisiana’s film industry development director. “Everyone wants to learn about the incentive program.”

No Comments


AFCI Locations Trade Show

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i3d82e5b0896238024e8360eeca9130bb

Savvy film, TV productions makes most of tax incentives

By Todd Longwell

In the upcoming Warner Bros. film “The Losers,” Puerto Rico portrays a wide variety of locales, including India, Bolivia, Chile, Miami and Los Angeles. But according to Puerto Rico film commissioner Mariella Perez-Serrano, it wasn’t the Caribbean commonwealth’s visual versatility that drew the comic book adaptation to its shores. It was its production incentive, which offers filmmakers a 40% transferable tax credit.

“These days, it’s all about the money,” Perez-Serrano says.

When it comes to incentive programs, there’s a lot of money to be had. In the past eight years, film and TV tax credits and rebates have proliferated, with one region leapfrogging over the other to offer a better deal. Today, there are significant production incentives in 44 U.S. states — up from five in 2002 — and a broad selection of countries around the globe, from Canada to New Zealand.

Faced with this wide variety, filmmakers have become savvy shoppers. Today, more than ever, they’re aware that the program offering the biggest raw percentages doesn’t always prove to be the best deal in the final audit.

“There are creative needs, financial needs, quality-of-life issues, travel time,” says Susan Croome, head of the British Columbia Film Commission. “The things they look at are different from show to show.”

One of the primary factors that drove Universal’s direct-to-DVD sequel “Death Race: Frankenstein Lives” to shoot in Cape Town, South Africa, this year was the travel requirements for its large cast of cars.

“We needed to import a lot of cars that were built in the U.S. that were not really registered, because they’re basically props,” producer Mike Elliott says. “South African custom officials recognized quickly what we were trying to do and guaranteed they’d be able to clear them for us in a couple of days, which they did. Other places we were considering shooting wanted as much as a month or even six weeks to clear the vehicles, and we just didn’t have time.”


Cape Town, South Africa

On top of that, “Death Race” needed a locale with decayed urban environments in which to stage its centerpiece demolition derby. A number of states in the northeastern U.S. have locations that fit the bill physically, and many come with attractive incentive programs, such as Michigan’s refundable 40%-42% tax credit. But they also tend to have regulations that make racing and wrecking cars more challenging, so Elliott looked to Central and Eastern Europe, where government restrictions tend to be more lax.

“The best locations we saw anywhere for this film were in Romania,” he notes. “There are gigantic, closed-down factories and steel plants on the same scale as the Northeast, but it would have been winter, and it’s hard to race cars around in the snow and the rain. It’s the same reason we couldn’t look at Montreal, where the first film was shot.”

In addition to warm weather, South Africa boasts a base 15% rebate on qualified expenditures, which “Death Race” was able to increase to 25% by structuring itself as a German/South African co-production.

Hawaii’s production incentive is relatively small by today’s standards, offering a refundable tax credit of 15% on Oahu and 20% on neighbor islands (Kauai, Lanai, Maui, Molokai and the Big Island). Worse, the total payout is capped at $8 million per production, paltry when one considers that “Avatar” earned $44.7 million by utilizing New Zealand’s 15% tax rebate program. Yet Hawaii was able to beat other tropical locales, including top contender Puerto Rico, to land the Disney sequel “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” which is scheduled to shoot on Oahu and Kauai in the summer.

“From what I understand, creatively people wanted to be here,” says Georja Skinner, administrator and film liaison for the Hawaii Film Office. “It’s closer to Burbank, with direct flights.”

Hawaii also has a substantial production infrastructure, with an experienced crew base bolstered by the presence of another Disney project, ABC’s “Lost,” which is conveniently wrapping its six-season run as “Pirates” ramps up preproduction. And the Aloha state tends to escape direct hits from hurricanes, an important consideration given that sets for the previous two “Pirates” sequels were destroyed when Hurricane Wilma blew through the Bahamas in October 2005.

But the tipping point in bringing “Pirates” to Hawaii might have been the potential for promotional cross-pollination with another venture.

“There’s a new Disney resort that will be opening here in 2011 around the time the film (premieres), called the Aulani Resort,” Skinner explains. For both Disney and Hawaii, “there are opportunities to promote the destination where the film was shot.”

Such cross-pollination, however, is rarely what matters most.

Typically, producers are more concerned with other things — like basic issues such as the currency exchange rate, the wages paid under local union agreements and, crucially, whether the government offering the incentive can pay in a timely fashion, a factor that might have influenced producers considering Michigan as a locale.

The initial enthusiasm that greeted the announcement of Michigan’s generous incentive in April 2008 was subsequently dampened by rumors that the state is slow to pay. But that may have been caused by misunderstanding of how the program works, according to Ed Spiegel, president of the payroll company Cast & Crew Services, which also offers incentive consulting for its clients.

“People are saying, ‘So-and-so hasn’t been paid yet; it’s been six months,’ ” Spiegel says. “Well, if you’re a corporate taxpayer and you filmed a movie in 2008, your corporate tax return isn’t due until March 2009, and most of them are going to file a six-month extension. It’s not a rebate state where you just submit the (paperwork) to a department and they cut a check right there.”

Failure to heed the fine print in Australian incentive regulations nearly cost the producers of Summit Entertainment’s “Knowing” upward of $10 million. The standard rebate for foreign productions shooting Down Under is only 15%, but co-writer/director Alex Proyas figured that, since he and the majority of the cast and crew were native Aussies, it would qualify as a homegrown production, entitling it to a 40% rebate. Then last year, after the $50 million film was completed, Screen Australia, which administers the rebate, announced it was only granting it a 15% credit, arguing that to get the full 40% a film needed to be created “from inception” by Australians. “Knowing,” which had been developed by a series of other writers and directors before Proyas got involved, didn’t qualify.

After Proyas went public with his complaints about the decision, the film was quietly granted the full 40% rebate.

Filmmakers also have to beware of content restrictions. In May, the Texas Film Commission refused to approve incentives for “Waco,” a proposed film about the 1993 raid on David Koresh’s Branch Davidian compound, because it was deemed in violation of a 2007 provision in the incentive law barring payments to movies that “portray Texas or Texans in a negative light.” Utah’s incentive has a similar clause.

The producers of “Waco” decided to take their project elsewhere, but some aren’t above altering their story lines to take advantage of an incentive.


“Justified”

“What I’ve heard of from network executives is they can write a show about New York that’s shot in Toronto, but they can also have the writers change a show that’s written about New York and move its story to Boston,” says Stuart Suna, president of Silvercup Studios in Long Island City, which has been home to such TV shows as NBC’s “30 Rock” and HBO’s “The Sopranos.”

A studio is more likely to leave the story line intact and move the show wherever it can get the best deal. ABC’s New York-set “Ugly Betty” shot its pilot in the Big Apple in 2006, moved to Los Angeles for its first season, then in 2008 picked up and moved back to New York (and Silvercup) for its third season to take advantage of the state’s then-new 30% tax credit.

The loss of “Betty” finally pushed the California legislature to pass a production incentive package last year. It includes a 25% tax credit for “relocating” TV series, which helped draw the new Kentucky-set FX Western drama “Justified” to Santa Clarita, Calif., for its first season order, after shooting its pilot in and around Pittsburgh.

“They could’ve gotten the look they wanted in Georgia or Louisiana,” says Amy Lemisch, director of the California Film Commission. “They could’ve stayed in Pittsburgh. But they came here.” She adds, “Nine times out of 10, the producers would rather shoot here, because we have the crews and the infrastructure.”

Ironically, after years of moving around the world chasing the best deal, producer Elliott has come to the conclusion that the best place to shoot a really cheap film is, indeed right here in Hollywood, incentive or no incentive.

“Just hire a bunch of film students,” he says.

No Comments


Argentine cinema moves into the spotlight

http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100414/ART/704139986/1082

Ed Stocker

For years Argentine film, like a struggling schoolchild, seemed to miss out on the top prize. Features poured out of Mexico and Brazil, where they were eagerly swallowed by European and American festival programmers who showered them with awards. Yet Argentina seemed destined to produce only a few art-house films a year, never penetrating the all-important international markets with the same success as some of its Latin American counterparts.

But the sands have rapidly shifted. Argentina is basking in Oscar success after El Secreto de sus Ojos, directed by Juan José Campanella, picked up the award for Best Foreign Language Film. (A cleverly intertwined murder investigation and love story, the plot flits between the present day and the 1970s military dictatorship.) It was the first time an Argentine film had won at the Oscars since Luis Puenzo’s La Historia Oficial 25 years earlier.

Campanella’s success is perhaps an exception to the rule. It’s not every day that non-English films get to piggyback the colossal publicity machine that is the Academy Awards. Nonetheless, away from the glitz and the glamour of Hollywood, Argentine cinema is enjoying an extraordinary period of growth. Thanks to a new generation of talented directors that have emerged in the past decade, such as Lucrecia Martel, Lisandro Alonso and Pablo Trapero, the country produces some 80 films a year. And the annual independent film festival, the Buenos Aires Festival International de Cine Indpendiente (BAFICI), is showing that successful international film festivals and thought-provoking, art-house cinema are by no means mutually exclusive.

This year’s festival – the 12th edition – is running at nine locations around the capital. Numbers have swelled to around a quarter of a million visitors, and there were 1,069 screenings in 2009. It might not be the most famous film festival in Latin America, but the programmer Fernando Chiappussi believes it’s one of the most significant.

“Generally, Latin American colleagues refer to us as the most important festival in the region, at least in terms of independent cinema,” he says. “There are other bigger or more glamorous festivals, like Mar del Plata, Rio de Janeiro or Guadalajara, but BAFICI is very well established and is a dearly loved festival that gets a lot of attention.”

The film jury is made up of directors and actors from Europe and the US, including Angela Bassett-Vance of Malcolm X and Boyz in the Hood fame, and the principal awards categories are for Best International Film and Best Argentine Work, the latter for both feature and short. On top of these principal categories, there are innovation awards for future cinema and human rights, as well as all the usual Special Jury, Best Director and Best Actor garlands. It’s a hugely varied line-up, with the international competition alone featuring 19 films from countries including the US, Spain, Mexico, Singapore, Italy and Romania.

Festival rules dictate that films that have already received extensive national and international attention aren’t a priority. Indeed, many of the features selected from overseas are Latin American premieres. What’s intriguing about BAFICI is the way it sticks to its “independent” roots, giving Argentine audiences the chance to watch foreign films that are a world away from the big-budget ones that normally fill cinemas. Of the three US films in the international competition this year, Putty Hill, directed by Matt Porterfield, tells the story of people struggling to come to terms with a friend’s death from a heroin overdose. Another, Go Get Some Rosemary (Daddy Longlegs), directed by Ben and Joshua Safdie, looks at a divorced father’s relationship with his two sons.

The programmers’ task of selecting films isn’t always easy. Argentina’s industry may be growing but it’s still reliant on financial support from international film funds, which can sometimes call into question how “independent” the films being shown really are.

“The most obvious criteria,” Chiappussi says, “is independence in terms of production. But as Argentina doesn’t have a really consolidated industry, almost all cinema is dependent on state subsidies and the support of overseas co-production funds. There are some films that are looking to move away from this system in which one often has to ‘present’ a project before making the film.”

Other imperatives, he adds, are that the films BAFICI showcases need to be art house as opposed to entertainment, and that the festival keeps pushing the envelope with works that mainstream channels might find too much of a risk to show.

For all the cutting-edge programming, Argentine films at the 2010 festival continue to address the years of military dictatorship, still a raw wound for many who lived through the worst period in the 1970s. The film that opened the festival on April 8, Secuestro y Muerte (Abduction and Death), directed by Rafael Filippelli, is a dramatisation of real events surrounding the capture and murder of the former junta leader General Aramburu. The closing film, meanwhile, Los Condenados (The Condemned), directed by the Spaniard Isaki Lacuesta, is set in present-day Argentina and centres around a group of former militants helping a forensic team find the body of an ex-partner. Other films, such as El Predio (The Building), showing in the Cine del Futuro category, is an avant-garde documentary about ESMA, a navy school in Buenos Aires used as one of the main torture centres during the dictatorship.

So why does Argentine cinema continue to tackle these issues from the past? “It’s an idea that’s still attractive due to its dramatic possibilities,” Chiappussi says. “And at the same time, it’s perceived as a burden because in the 1980s many films were made documenting the repression. Even now, Argentine cinema tends to be associated with this theme from abroad.”

While the success of La Historia Oficial set a precedent for this type of cinema, directors are finding new ways to tackle these sensitive topics with films like La Mujer Sin Cabeza (The Headless Women) from Lucrecia Martel, which looks at ideas related to the dictatorship – such as the impunity of the upper classes and the pact of silence surrounding their actions – without explicitly referencing it.

“It’s like what happened with post-Nazi German cinema,” Chiappussi says. “Each new generation will find a different way of talking about the subject, and also the need to do it. These are traumatic episodes that both attract and repulse.”

Of course, there are Argentine films covering everything from political corruption to the aesthetic beauty of Buenos Aires at this year’s festival. And with two films in competition, Rodríguez and Somos Nosotros, from self-starters born in the 1980s, it might be time for even the new school to step aside for the latest crop of directorial talent.

With Buenos Aires Lab – a business network that looks to forge stronger links between film-producing Latin American countries – running alongside the festival, and a special arts fund from the city to help potential BAFICI directors, the state of Argentine cinema has never looked in such good health: bold, thought-provoking and, most importantly, independent.

The 2010 edition of BAFICI runs until Sunday. Visit www.bafici.gov.ar for more information.

No Comments


Int’l producers to get their shot at PGA event

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3id51767e5e16b0979822d108e23e09b86

Five will be invited to attend first film co-prod’n showcase

By Gregg Kilday

The Producers Guild of America will offer five international film producers the opportunity to meet with their U.S. counterparts at its inaugural International Film Co-Production Showcase.

CoProShow, as the project market will be dubbed, will take place in connection with the PGA’s second annual Produced by Conference, set for June 4-6 at the Fox Studios in Los Angeles.

“The CoProShow is the first international feature film project market to take place in Hollywood, and we couldn’t ask for a more exciting venue to launch,” said Stu Levy, chair of the PGA’s international committee. “A producer’s job inevitably must consider an increasingly interconnected world, and the PGA is dedicated to being a gateway for international producers to the U.S. market.”

Interested producers must submit by April 30 a screenplay synopsis for a feature-length project under development. It then will be reviewed by a panel of U.S. producers, and five finalists will be invited to attend the PBC weekend event.

No Comments


Peru Seeks To Be Destination For Film Shooting

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v5/newsworld.php?id=483914

LIMA, March 20 (Bernama) — Peru seeks to promote the country as a destination for film shooting, the Commission on the Promotion of Peru for Export and Tourism (Promperu) announced, reports China’s Xinhua news agency.

The state-run company Promperu said in a statement that it will present Peru as an ideal destination for film production and advertisement at an international tourism fair, AFCI Locations Trade Show 2010, which will run from April 15 to 17 in Santa Monica, United States.

The event, organized by the Association of Film Commissioners International and integrated by professionals from the U.S. film industry, television and commercial video, is one of the most important fairs in the American film industry. It aims to find new venues for film shooting.

Some important audiovisual industry suppliers and film professionals will meet during the event to exchange information on new film-shooting locations, costs, resources and tax incentives. More than 3,500 professionals from 30 countries attended the fair last year.

– BERNAMA

No Comments


Peru’s film industry: It’s hard to turn a profit, but there’s growing demand

http://www.livinginperu.com/blogs/business/1259

By Luis Felipe Gamarra, El Comercio
Adapted from Spanish by Diana Schwalb

It is not hard to guess, despite the success of The Milk of Sorrow, why so few companies want to invest in the film industry in Peru. For the directors and producers in the industry, making films is not profitable.

According to interviews with people in Peru’s film industry, the average cost of making a movie in Peru is about $300,000. To recover the investment through the box office, the movies would have to be seen by almost 350,000 people. If the movie is more expensive to make, it will need more viewers.

This is a difficult number of viewers to attract for a market that in 2009 had 760,000 moviegoers for Peruvian films. That represents only 5% of 2009’s 20 million, as reported in a book on Peru’s film industry by Nathalie Hendrickx and Augusto Tamayo. The remaining 95% belongs to the Hollywood movies.

“In the best case scenario, box office sales only serve to recover the investment but nothing more,” said Jaime Carvajal, who has produced three animated films (Pirates in Callao, Dragons and Valentino) and two feature films. For Carvajal, the most effective way to generate profits is to distribute the film throughout Latin America and in Europe and the USA.

Because, far from what one thinks, says Carvajal, Peruvian TV channels do not pay anything for the right to broadcast a film and international cable channels pay between $12,000 and $15,000. “It’s not a lot of money,” said Carvajal.

So, are there profits to be made? “No, there is not,” says Enid Campos. “Your budget will cover your expenses and salaries, but there will be no profit. The films that I have produced (Paloma de papel, Dioses, Días de Santiago and Madeinusa) did not make a profit at the box office, I know.”

One film that made money through the box office was Mañana Te Cuento by Eduardo Mendoza. The film, released in 2005, cost $160,000 to make and made $210,000 at the box office.

Other sources of financing
To produce a film with a budget that averages $300,000, one can run for the National Film Board (Conacine) award, whose feature film award in the category reaches $168,000.

The remaining budget funds could be covered by Ibermedia, World Cinema Fund Hubert Bals Fund and the Cannes Cinefundation who donate between $50,000 and $120,000. This is the only way to make a movie.

One positive trend for Peruvian films is that there are more viewers. There has been a growth of between 7 and 10 percent since 1998. If the market increases, the public and private sectors must invest more, so that Peru’s movies can continue to shine in the world.

No Comments


Tight Budgets Effect Worldwide Film Production

http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2010/02/09/tight-budgets-effect-worldwide-film-production/

Cash-Strapped Studios Slash Films from New Zealand to Canada

By: Valerie Milano

HOLLYWOOD,CA–Ovum, a global analysis and consulting firm, reports that in a recent survey the tighter budgets of 2010 will have a direct effect on contact center outsourcing providers across North America, New Zealand, Australia and Western Europe. Only 1 in 5 businesses felt their budgets would grow.

According to Peter Ryan, Lead Analyst, based in Canada, “This placed tremendous pressure on enterprises that maintain in-house contact centers, as limited cash on hand means that they are unable to invest in new and leading-edge technology, and agent management will be compromised in terms of investing in ongoing training or increased staff incentives. These will result in the erosion of the end-user relationship over the long-term”.

With this in mind, the role of contract center outsourcers has changed since 2008 when the recession began. Today businesses are looking for partners who can develop new sales opportunities and maintain customer loyalty.

Outsourcers offering a superior level of service will go beyond the standard service call. Creating sales by offering add-ons and upsales of additional products and services increases sales while encouraging customers to stay rather than seek other providers will reduce the actual cost of the contract service center and increase profitability.

Although budgets will remain tight, taking advantage of all the tools in the box can result in improved sales and happy, loyal end-users.

No Comments



SetPageWidth